PATENTS

Analysis
A 1970s-era disclosure in the published record for remote EEG-oriented apparatus. It is evidence of what inventors were willing to file, not evidence that a specific operational system tracks any individual today.

Key claim (reader digest)
Independent claims cover remote interference with / modulation of brain-wave activity using paired transmitters and interference at the subject — read the issued claims for exact scope, not popular summaries.

Verify assignee chain and claim elements against the PDF before citing in legal arguments.

Analysis
Stocklin’s published grant is a concrete patent-record anchor for “RF → auditory percept” hardware narratives. It does not prove the mechanism (Frey-class thermoelastic vs. other coupling paths) or any modern deployment — it proves disclosure and claimed subject matter in the record.

Key claim (reader digest)
The specification discusses using microwave-frequency energy (the grant text references a broad RF band in the MHz range) to couple audio-derived information into neural hearing pathways — bridge the file to thermoelastic / cochlear coupling discussions in MODULE_02.

Cross-check frequency ranges and embodiments in the PDF; do not paraphrase beyond what the claims cover.

Analysis
Kept here as a cautionary example: patent numbers in secondary lists drift. The drawings below are authentic for this grant only.

Key claim (reader digest)
Claims and specification address conductive water-jet paths for lightning diversion — not VLF/ELF neural coupling. If your notes mapped this number to bio / nervous-system subject matter, the ID is likely wrong; locate the intended grant.

Always match number → title → inventor before building a chain of reasoning.

Analysis
Provides a patent-record reference for weak-field, resonance-oriented neural influence claims. Pairs with Adey-window / excitability language in MODULE_02 as filed IP, not as a field measurement from your location.

Key claim (reader digest)
Manipulation of nervous system function via weak external magnetic fields tuned toward sensory resonance — specification discusses sub-Hz to low-Hz modulation regimes that overlap the “windowing” theme in MODULE_02 (verify exact ranges in the issued document).

Read independent claims; distinguish apparatus from proven health outcomes.

Analysis
Useful as a record of commercial / assignee-side filing (Universal Hedonics) in the brain-state modulation space. Not a substitute for calibrated exposure evidence in an individual case.

Key claim (reader digest)
Discloses methods/devices coupling EEG-related parameters to stimulation toward target brain states — read claims for the exact closed-loop elements; often mis-attributed online as “Loos” by number confusion.

Expired as of adjusted dates in USPTO / Google Patents — confirm in your legal memo.